Quality determines the standards by which executors will place Web 2.0 backlinks. We offer three quality levels:
Standard – starting from $1.5
Plus – starting from $2.25
Premium – starting from $5
What distinguishes these quality levels?
Standard Quality – Basic backlink placement without additional requirements for content or thematic relevance.
Plus – Enhanced quality with detailed answers (at least 200 characters) and forum parameters (with at least 1000 visitors per month).
Premium – The highest quality placement. Includes adherence to thematic relevance and more thorough content and design preparation.
Can thematic relevance be required when placing backlinks?
Yes, thematic relevance is available for the "Premium" option. However, it is important to note that thematic requirements at the platform level may slow down order fulfillment, as this complicates the process. For niche topics, executors can adhere to thematic relevance only at the level of discussion content and text, not at the entire platform level.
Why is it not recommended to demand platform-level thematic relevance?
This can significantly delay the completion time. The narrower the website's topic, the harder it is to find a suitable resource for backlink placement, which may result in delays. We recommend limiting thematic requirements to the discussion level.
Quality |
Standart |
Plus |
Premium |
Topic and Region |
Executors will find thematic discussions on forums (no older than 6 months) and leave a backlink.
Executors must adhere to the domain's regional relevance within the country, not the city (e.g., .ru domain must link to Russian forums). If city-level relevance is required, it will expand to the country level.
|
Executors will find thematic discussions on forums (no older than 6 months) and leave a backlink.
Executors must adhere to the domain's regional relevance within the country, not the city (e.g., .ru domain must link to Russian forums). If city-level relevance is required, it will expand to the country level.
|
Executors will find a thematic discussion on a forum (no older than 6 months) and leave a backlink.
According to system rules, executors are required to adhere to the regional relevance of the client's domain and forum within the country but not the city. For example, if the client's website is in the .ru domain, the forum must be based in Russia. If the client requires city-specific relevance, it will automatically be expanded to the country level.
|
Non-anchor backlink within 150+ symbols text |
|
Executors will write a detailed response to a question raised in the discussion, with a length of at least 200 characters, including your backlink.
Executors will place a non-anchor backlink.
There is a response from other users to the executor's message.
|
Executors will write a detailed response to a question raised in the discussion, with a length of at least 300 characters, including your backlink.
Executors will place a direct clickable backlink.
|
No duplicates |
|
|
|
Forum parameters |
Selecting forums with more than 500 pages indexed in Google additionally.
Selecting forums with a DR parameter of at least 10.
Selecting forums with at least 1,000 visitors per month (according to Similarweb or Spymetrics data).
|
Selecting forums with more than 500 pages indexed in Google additionally.
Selecting forums with a DR parameter of at least 10.
Selecting forums with at least 5,000 visitors per month (according to Similarweb or Spymetrics data).
Profile with an uploaded photo (if allowed).
|
Selecting forums with more than 500 pages indexed in Google additionally.
Selecting forums with a DR parameter of at least 10.
Selecting forums with at least 5,000 visitors per month (according to Similarweb or Spymetrics data).
The executor’s profile on the platform (used to post the message with the backlink) must have at least 20 published messages, an uploaded profile photo (if allowed), and a registration date of at least 1 month.
The placement platform must be thematically relevant to the client’s website for broad topics.
For narrow topics, thematic relevance at the discussion level is acceptable.
|
Was this article helpful?